🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned order, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional district plan that could add up to five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three decision, issued on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to overturn a federal judge's block that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Rationale

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating much confusion and upsetting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its decision.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely classified voters according to their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the new maps. It had ordered the state to employ the boundaries established after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Opposition

Through a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She argued that it disrespected the work of the district court, pointing out that its decision was crafted by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a breach of the law of the land.

Countrywide Redistricting Battle

The ruling is part of a national battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican hold. Typically, map-drawing happens after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that might create several more conservative seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have countered with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State attorney general praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes favorable to Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

Conversely, Democratic leaders decried the decision. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another senior House figure stated the court had once again eroded its credibility by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.